Wednesday, December 4, 2013
What a couple of years
I just realized that it has been 2 years already....I guess I should explain. in the late fall of 2010, I had an idea about how to improve datacenters & simplify them all at the same time. If converged the different parts of the datacenter into a single platform, you could really remake how things are done for companies & make life simpler and less expensive. I toyed with the idea for a few months, then talked to some folks at my company about it in the summer of 2011 - some of which had been thinking along similar lines but hadn't figured out the specifics of how to do it. By the late fall of 2011, I decided that I had a pretty good idea of how to make this thing called hyperconvergence work, so late one Sunday night in November, after the kids had woken me up & I couldn't get back to sleep, I decided to sneak into my lab and give it a go.....and it worked awesome. I pitched the principals at my company on it the next day, and since they had had a similar notion in the past, they loved it. Within a week, we were getting down to brass tacks on a productized version of my prototype and pivoting the company to focus on it.....amazing and heady stuff. In the time between then and now, the "little pet project" has grown far beyond me, and better minds than mine are taking it in awesome directions. Now, 2 years almost to the day later, I look around at all the companies running our gear, look at what amounts to an entirely new category of computing, and marvel that my kids keeping me up one night can really change my industry....
Tuesday, August 27, 2013
Monday, July 15, 2013
2 Nations?
This week it was made public 10 counties in Colorado
are discussing a plan to secede from the State and form a new state
called North Colorado. They do so because they feel the State Government
no longer represents them or their beliefs. This idea is being
discussed in many geographic areas in the US where political conflicts
occur and people are so far apart they see no hope of any compromise.
Should the United States become two different countries? We as a nation fought a Civil War almost 150 years ago to preserve the Union. At that time we were two countries. One was industrialized and the other basically agriculture and deeply committed to slavery. Yet they were clearly defined regions. The war became violent when instead of peacefully working for separation from the Union; the South attacked the Union forces at Ft Sumter, starting the Civil War. In fact not everyone in the North supported the War or the abolition of Slavery. Those in the North opposing the war were called 'Copperheads".
Today we face a similar separation as a nation, no it is not slavery. Thank God the Civil War settled that issue. However today we are increasingly two separate nations that are growing further and further apart and increasingly losing their tolerance of the other side's beliefs. Maybe it is time for a peaceful separation of the United States. Allow me to discuss what basically separates our people into two camps.
We continue to develop into two peoples. One is Progressive/ Liberal, and the other Conservative. The Progressive/ Liberals are free spenders and believe that the rich should be heavily taxed In order to achieve social justice. They believe in big government that reaches into every aspect of an individual's life. They do not support a strong defense and often look down on the military. They believe all issues with foreign nations can be settled diplomatically and are more concerned with social issues internally than with international problems. They do not believe in the individual but do support the common good. They think Capitalism and profits are evil and need to be highly controlled as profits are minimized or eliminated. Generally, they believe in lightening up drug laws, they support same sex marriages and are pro abortion yet interesting anti death penalty. They often mimic people of faith. They support open borders and think globally rather than nationally. They are generally the "Green People" that do not want drilling anywhere, and want a complete switch to alternative fuels. Yet they do not want the wind mills, solar panel farms, nuclear plants, or other energy producing plants near their homes. They believe the Constitution to be an outmoded document that can be interpreted to support anything they wish to start. They support schools being responsible for many lessons in life that the conservatives feel are a parental responsibility. They also want to ban the 2nd amendment – the right to bear arms. Liberal/Progressives are usually more concerned with the rights of criminals over the rights of the victims. Obviously, the Conservative views are for the most part opposite of the above Progressive/Liberal views.
I think a case can be made to separate the nation into 2 countries. Basically if you take from Maryland north, then go west adding states that border Canada, and add the West Coast, you have the basis of a country. The remainder of the nation could form the Traditional United states. Obviously any state could elect to join either nation. What I am proposing is a starting place. There will be people in states that want to join the other United States rather than the one their state selected. I propose we use the computer systems already in place that allow people to swap homes and/ or jobs in the states they want to join. Real Estate already has this as an option. People could be given a year to accomplish this action.
The Traditional United States would have in its core beliefs:
• Strict interpretation to the Constitution
• Fiscally sound spending by government
• Term limits- 2 terms for a Senator and 4 terms for a Representative.
• Fair tax of 15% paid by all
• Increased personal responsibility / accountability
• Belief in freedom of religion yet understanding the Constitution did not ban government from recognizing religion but forbid the Federal and State governments from establishing a state religion.
• Marriage would remain defined as between one man and one woman. However Civil Unions would be allowed for alternative life styles thus protecting their legal rights.
• String military which should not be a problem since the "other US" generally looks down on them and wants to minimize any budget they get.
• Enforcement of all laws including the death penalty in capital offenses.
• Strong borders yet fully supportive of legal immigration.
• Full ban on partial birth abortion. Counseling options before an early term abortion is allowed. Parental consent on abortions of girls under 17.
• An energy policy that makes sense. Safely drill in domestic areas for oil and natural gas. Develop the technology to use clean coal, while developing alternative fuels for the future.
• Maintain the space exploration program. It has given us many breakthroughs in medicine and other technologies as well as knowledge of the stars.
• Schools are a states issue and should concentrate on education rather than social issues.
• Solve the frivolous law suits issue by a simple rule – if you lose you pay the winners court costs.
Base on the 10th Amendment, I believe the States could opt of the union as they opted in. This is the State rights amendment. Since the 10th Amendment says:
"The powers not delegated to the United States by the Constitution, nor prohibited by it to the States, are reserved to the states respectfully, or to the People."
Nowhere in the Constitution does it forbid a state from legally seceding. I believe a strong case could be made through federal courts in support of this interpretation of the 10th Amendment. In fact, part of the Texas Constitution, Approved by the US when accepting them into the Union, was the idea they had the right to secede. Now under equal protection under the law, does that not extend to all states?
Before my Progressive friends yell racism, let me respond in fact that statement is in itself racist. Liberal/ Progressives are the people that usually put Americans into types or classes. I am confident based on the many people I know, the beliefs I have listed above are common to most Americans regardless of race, ethnicity or economic level. Traditional family values know no economic, ethnic or racial boundary. They can be found in all Americans. So to imply that these values are put there to separate the races are in fact racist and could not be farther from the truth.
This is not an option I readily support. However if this nation cannot move itself back to the center right nation that it in fact is, nor if we as a people cannot not be more tolerant of dissenting views (this goes for both sides) nor if we as a people are not willing to compromise and work on the areas we agree, then this may be the only solution short of chaos. The one factor the Liberal States will not admit but is a real factor in their opposition to such a plan would be the simple fact of Life:
Conservatives can live and survive without Liberals but Liberals cannot survive without Conservatives
http://www.beaufortobserver.net/Articles-NEWS-and-COMMENTARY-c-2013-07-14-267841.112112
Should the United States become two different countries? We as a nation fought a Civil War almost 150 years ago to preserve the Union. At that time we were two countries. One was industrialized and the other basically agriculture and deeply committed to slavery. Yet they were clearly defined regions. The war became violent when instead of peacefully working for separation from the Union; the South attacked the Union forces at Ft Sumter, starting the Civil War. In fact not everyone in the North supported the War or the abolition of Slavery. Those in the North opposing the war were called 'Copperheads".
Today we face a similar separation as a nation, no it is not slavery. Thank God the Civil War settled that issue. However today we are increasingly two separate nations that are growing further and further apart and increasingly losing their tolerance of the other side's beliefs. Maybe it is time for a peaceful separation of the United States. Allow me to discuss what basically separates our people into two camps.
We continue to develop into two peoples. One is Progressive/ Liberal, and the other Conservative. The Progressive/ Liberals are free spenders and believe that the rich should be heavily taxed In order to achieve social justice. They believe in big government that reaches into every aspect of an individual's life. They do not support a strong defense and often look down on the military. They believe all issues with foreign nations can be settled diplomatically and are more concerned with social issues internally than with international problems. They do not believe in the individual but do support the common good. They think Capitalism and profits are evil and need to be highly controlled as profits are minimized or eliminated. Generally, they believe in lightening up drug laws, they support same sex marriages and are pro abortion yet interesting anti death penalty. They often mimic people of faith. They support open borders and think globally rather than nationally. They are generally the "Green People" that do not want drilling anywhere, and want a complete switch to alternative fuels. Yet they do not want the wind mills, solar panel farms, nuclear plants, or other energy producing plants near their homes. They believe the Constitution to be an outmoded document that can be interpreted to support anything they wish to start. They support schools being responsible for many lessons in life that the conservatives feel are a parental responsibility. They also want to ban the 2nd amendment – the right to bear arms. Liberal/Progressives are usually more concerned with the rights of criminals over the rights of the victims. Obviously, the Conservative views are for the most part opposite of the above Progressive/Liberal views.
I think a case can be made to separate the nation into 2 countries. Basically if you take from Maryland north, then go west adding states that border Canada, and add the West Coast, you have the basis of a country. The remainder of the nation could form the Traditional United states. Obviously any state could elect to join either nation. What I am proposing is a starting place. There will be people in states that want to join the other United States rather than the one their state selected. I propose we use the computer systems already in place that allow people to swap homes and/ or jobs in the states they want to join. Real Estate already has this as an option. People could be given a year to accomplish this action.
The Traditional United States would have in its core beliefs:
• Strict interpretation to the Constitution
• Fiscally sound spending by government
• Term limits- 2 terms for a Senator and 4 terms for a Representative.
• Fair tax of 15% paid by all
• Increased personal responsibility / accountability
• Belief in freedom of religion yet understanding the Constitution did not ban government from recognizing religion but forbid the Federal and State governments from establishing a state religion.
• Marriage would remain defined as between one man and one woman. However Civil Unions would be allowed for alternative life styles thus protecting their legal rights.
• String military which should not be a problem since the "other US" generally looks down on them and wants to minimize any budget they get.
• Enforcement of all laws including the death penalty in capital offenses.
• Strong borders yet fully supportive of legal immigration.
• Full ban on partial birth abortion. Counseling options before an early term abortion is allowed. Parental consent on abortions of girls under 17.
• An energy policy that makes sense. Safely drill in domestic areas for oil and natural gas. Develop the technology to use clean coal, while developing alternative fuels for the future.
• Maintain the space exploration program. It has given us many breakthroughs in medicine and other technologies as well as knowledge of the stars.
• Schools are a states issue and should concentrate on education rather than social issues.
• Solve the frivolous law suits issue by a simple rule – if you lose you pay the winners court costs.
Base on the 10th Amendment, I believe the States could opt of the union as they opted in. This is the State rights amendment. Since the 10th Amendment says:
"The powers not delegated to the United States by the Constitution, nor prohibited by it to the States, are reserved to the states respectfully, or to the People."
Nowhere in the Constitution does it forbid a state from legally seceding. I believe a strong case could be made through federal courts in support of this interpretation of the 10th Amendment. In fact, part of the Texas Constitution, Approved by the US when accepting them into the Union, was the idea they had the right to secede. Now under equal protection under the law, does that not extend to all states?
Before my Progressive friends yell racism, let me respond in fact that statement is in itself racist. Liberal/ Progressives are the people that usually put Americans into types or classes. I am confident based on the many people I know, the beliefs I have listed above are common to most Americans regardless of race, ethnicity or economic level. Traditional family values know no economic, ethnic or racial boundary. They can be found in all Americans. So to imply that these values are put there to separate the races are in fact racist and could not be farther from the truth.
This is not an option I readily support. However if this nation cannot move itself back to the center right nation that it in fact is, nor if we as a people cannot not be more tolerant of dissenting views (this goes for both sides) nor if we as a people are not willing to compromise and work on the areas we agree, then this may be the only solution short of chaos. The one factor the Liberal States will not admit but is a real factor in their opposition to such a plan would be the simple fact of Life:
Conservatives can live and survive without Liberals but Liberals cannot survive without Conservatives
http://www.beaufortobserver.net/Articles-NEWS-and-COMMENTARY-c-2013-07-14-267841.112112
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)
As soon as this nation decided that one citizen has the right to another's property, this nation disconnected from any relation to actual freedom. Worse, our supposed benefactors who have been nominated, often by themselves, to execute upon the redistribution of property to provide these entitled goods and services, eventually and inevitably become a true ruling class, elevated on the self-righteous benevolence they provide without the recievers consent. They ignore the fact that they seized it from someone without permission, and defend their position of provider only. In the end, the re-distributors become our masters, and the rest, slaves.
And this is where the premise of anyone being entitled to health care, or any other material service or good enabled by someone else's wealth falls on its face. A free society cannot entitle one citizen to another's wealth, without both creating a ruling class, and also enslaving themselves to it.
Health Care cannot be an inalienable right, because as our forefathers said, inalienable rights are endowed by our Creator, not some meddling liberal busy body, who self-righteously decides who is entitled to whomever else s wealth. Soon, we too will decide it is "necessary to dissolve the political bands that connect us with one another, and we will assume among the powers of the earth, the separate and equal station to which the Laws of Nature and of Nature's God entitle us, a decent respect to the opinions of mankind requires that they should declare the causes which impel them to the separation."
Right now, our rights to liberty and the pursuit of happiness are secondary to those invented by the re-distributors Governments are instituted among men to secure only the inalienable rights, and that is why conservatives are right about health care, and liberals are wrong, if we are to pay any homage to our basest documents and the goals of our founding fathers.